Post-colonialism & gender: a focus on Kenyan women
From 1920 until 1963, Kenya was under British colonial rule. The era was a sombre chapter in the nation’s history, characterised by egregious war crimes and human rights violations. The British pursuit “to uphold colonial supremacy, often through brutal and inhumane methods, meant a systemic decades-long campaign of violence and oppression” (Thompson, 2023). The particular abiding effects of colonialism in Kenya still echo today, as independence did not signify freedom from the crystallisation of colonial rule. In 1963, while Kenyan colonial subjects became citizens at independence, women “were excluded from state resources, social services, and full political enfranchisement” (Moskowitz, 2023).
This was neither the decolonising future the Mau Mau rebellion had promised nor the empowerment Kenyan women were seeking from British expulsion. Today, the hardships experienced by postcolonial Kenyan women are still in reverberation: Kenyan women only enjoy 81% of the legal rights of men (World Bank Group, 2023) and experience high rates of femicide (UN Women, 2024).
Postcolonial theory is a body of critical thinking primarily focused on “accounting for the political, economic, historical, and social impact of European colonial rule around the world” (Elam, 2019). In IR, a postcolonial lens examines how societies, governments, gender, and race in the former colonised regions experience international relations. The terminology “post” does not imply the impact of colonial rule has dissipated; rather, it accentuates the myriad effects Western imperialism still shapes societies today and marginalises the non-Western world (Nair, 2017). This analysis aims to shed light on the gendered ramifications of Western colonialism in Kenya by observing the status of Kenyan women throughout the decades. By enquiring about Kenyan women’s status post-independence, we prove freedom from imperialism has never been settled and women continue to be the major burden-carriers of colonialism.
“There was no change”: for many Kenyan women, independence from British colonial rule did not equate to freedom. The independent era produced few physical changes for women—and the perpetuation of this transitional moment shaped women’s political imaginaries.
“Continued landlessness, in particular, perpetuated structural gendered inequalities, and political marginalisation coloured the ways in which Kenyan women made sense of decolonisation. Many of the social, political and economic realities of Kenyan women remained similar before and after independence: they remained disenfranchised” (Moskowitz, 2023).
When Kenya became independent in 1963, the colonists had not just “come, plundered, and left; in their wake, they left the stench of colonisation we still bear today” (Ochieng, 2022).
Colonialism had promoted a model of gender “which relegated women to the domestic sphere and strengthened patriarchy” (Hepburn., 2023).
Figure 1: Unknown. (1946) African women making rugs in Kenya at Fort Hall near Nyeri. Available at: https://storymaps.com/stories/6c6fd86469bc4a988d69254d59bda534
Longstanding literature on gender and feminist history had already exposed that in sundry African settings, decolonisation did not signify the promised changes for women. Kenyan women were never decolonised. Their bodies and minds remained imprinted with the imperialist power dynamics, which were usurping their autonomy from new local leaders. Pre-colonial Kenya illustrated a divergent picture of women’s status in society: in many communities within East Africa, “women had a voice and were respected in their own rights, even if in some communities, male dominance was evident” (Kilonzo and Akallah, 2021). The existence of matrilineal communities showcases this dichotomy prior to colonial rule. Land concessions and loss of control of their economy “effectively excluded women from meaningful participation in African societies and led to an unfamiliar economic dependence on men” (Saungweme, 2021). In colonial Kenya, patriarchy and colonialism changed gender dynamics and “introduced unprecedented levels of gender inequality with economic and social consequences” (Saungweme, 2021). Crucially, the advent of British colonialism intertwined with the European approach to gender relations leveraged the status quo for Kenya’s society. A society in which women had no voice, no power, no tangibility.
Beyond the binary of Kenyan resistance and colonial hegemony, we find how postcolonial realities did not elucidate equally to all. The aftermath of “war,” “conflict,” and “colonisation is a gendered concept, “since for women, it can signify little change when gendered violence, inequality, and marginalisation continue in post-conflict societies” (Moskowitz, 2023). When the Million Acre Scheme opened in 1962, single women—whether unmarried, divorced, or widowed—were considered ineligible to purchase land through the program. The program aimed at providing Kenyans with agricultural agency to transform the nation. Yet, the policy was geared towards maintaining the gendered status quo:
“The policy not only protected men’s authority and offered them a monopoly on property rights, but also ensured the conservation of marriage institutions and the nuclear family with a male head of household, forcing women into positions of dependency with male relatives” (Moskowitz, 2023).
The gendered responsibilities in post-colonial Kenya—men provide, women depend on men—illustrated how British rule had impregnated the constellation of societal rules and expectations. Women could observe how men acquired land previously owned by white settlers; slaves were now free; and husbands spoke of independence as a momentous glory for Kenya. Yet, women’s positions were stagnant. Interviewed by Moskowitz in December 2012, a Kenyan woman, Helen Kirua, argued how independence did not equate to change: “Everything belonged to my husband, even the children. I was just there. I owned nothing.” Post-colonial gender constructs of women and men further positioned women as inferior to men and “took away women’s ability to make decisions for themselves about land rights, reproductive rights, and sexual health” (Saungweme, 2021).
Postcolonial Nairobi was a failed promise to Kenyan women. Today, this failed promise is illustrated by systemic societal discrimination towards women coupled with deep-rooted effects of colonialist epistemological practices. As the inequalities introduced during colonialism have been perpetuated and gendered exclusions have been further entrenched, “women in post-colonial Kenya began to express distinct temporal imaginings of decolonisation as a period where “nothing changed” (Moskowitz, 2023).
Kenyan women were the paramount martyrs of colonial rule. Post-colonial independent Kenya has not liberated women. “Patriarchy is the common thread of both colonial and post-colonial times” (Saungweme, 2021). British gender roles shaped post-colonial and independent Kenya, subjugating women to a Western imperialist status quo linked to domination, submission, and lack of agency. Starking contrasts between pre and post-colonialism indicate how European dictum is a direct cause for the pains Kenyan women face today. Thus, the exigency of a post-colonial gendered lens is needed to comprehend the consequences woven into the social and political liberation struggles of contemporary Kenyan women.
List of references
Elam, J.D. (2019). Postcolonial Theory. [online] Oxford Bibliographies. Available at: https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/display/document/obo-9780190221911/obo-9780190221911-0069.xml.
Hepburn, S. (2023). Women in Kenya. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of African History. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190277734.013.1607.
Kilonzo, S.M. and Akallah, J.A. (2021). Women in Colonial East Africa. The Palgrave Handbook of African Women’s Studies, [online] pp.1133–1149. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28099-4_127.
Moskowitz, K. (2024). View of ‘There Was No Change’: Kenyan Women, Temporality, and Decolonization | Nordic Journal of African Studies. [online] Njas.fi. Available at: https://njas.fi/njas/article/view/913/617.
Nair, S. (2017). Introducing Postcolonialism in International Relations Theory. [online] E-International Relations. Available at: https://www-e–ir-info.translate.goog/2017/12/08/postcolonialism-in-international-relations-theory/?_x_tr_sch=http&_x_tr_sl=en&_x_tr_tl=ca&_x_tr_hl=ca&_x_tr_pto=sc.
Ochieng, J. (2022). On Decolonization, African Countries and a Postcolonial Nairobi | Opinion | The Harvard Crimson. [online] www.thecrimson.com. Available at: https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2022/10/21/ochieng-decolonization-africa-postcolonial-nairobi/.
Saungweme, F.J.S. (2021). A Critique of Africa’s Post-Colonial Freedoms Through a Feminist Lens: Challenging Patriarchy and Assessing the Gains | Heinrich Böll Stiftung | Cape Town. South Africa | Namibia | Zimbabwe. [online] Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung. Available at: https://za.boell.org/en/2021/07/07/critique-africas-post-colonial-freedoms-through-feminist-lens-challenging-patriarchy.
Thompson, C. (2023). Exposing the Shadows of British Colonial Rule in Kenya: A Legacy of Atrocities. [online] Black History Month 2024. Available at: https://www.blackhistorymonth.org.uk/article/section/african-history/exposing-the-shadows-of-british-colonial-rule-in-kenya-a-legacy-of-atrocities/.
UN Women (2024). Femicide cases in Kenya fuel urgent calls for action to end violence against women. [online] UN Women – Headquarters. Available at: https://www.unwomen.org/en/news-stories/feature-story/2024/02/femicide-cases-in-kenya-fuel-urgent-calls-for-action-to-end-violence-against-women.
World Bank Group (2023). Women in Kenya Enjoy Only 81% of the Legal Rights of Men. [online] World Bank. Available at: https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2023/03/29/women-in-afe-kenya-enjoy-only-81-of-the-legal-rights-of-men.